Tag Archive for 'Mayor'

Progressive London: Legacy or Future?

200811131050.jpgKen Livingstone has lauched Progressive London, a ‘coalition… to promote progressive policies in the city’.

With a logo which echoes Mr Livingstone’s previous “LondON” branding, and with a hint of his independent-purple colour scheme, the organisation has a distinctly leftish tinge. So what is it for?

MayorWatch reports that “the coalition is expected to campaign against Mayor Johnson’s recently announced above-inflation fare increase.” So, it’s a campaigning body, right?

However, not all on the left are happy - Workers Liberty call it “quite transparently a vehicle for Ken Livingstone to return to City Hall in 2012″ and then go on to castigate Mr Livingstone’s convenient memory-loss over his own above-inflation fare increases.

Mr Livingstone has stated that he’d like to return to his old job in the past. Is Workers Liberty correct to assert that this enterprise is his poorly-disguised Trojan horse?Until Progressive London do more, it’s going to be hard to tell.

Perhaps Mr Livingstone himself is unsure - this could be his swan-song: creating a leftish coalition for the capital in order to combat the blueish tinge which currently covers local government. His legacy would be a new candidate, built from the grassroots, and a prize for himself as the grand old man of London politics. Of course, that could just be wishful thinking.

Your thoughts?

UPDATE: Andrew Gilligan writes eloquently on Progressive London and what it means for the capital here.

People’s Question Time

200810131013.jpg

The details for the latest People’s Question Time have been released and can be found below:

Time: 7.00pm – 9.00pm (doors open at 6.00pm)

Main Hall
Bromley Civic Centre
Stockwell Close
Bromley BR1 3UH

How to get there

Tickets to attend People’s Question Time (PQT) are free, but you should request your ticket(s) in advance.

How to get tickets

Your opportunity

People’s Question Time is your chance to ask the Mayor of London Boris Johnson and members of the London Assembly what they are doing for the capital and its people. This PQT meeting will be chaired by the Bromley & Bexley London Assembly Member – James Cleverly.

PQT happens twice a year. The four main issues it will focus on are policing and safety, transport,environment and the London Olympics Games in 2012. There will be an opportunity at the end to raise other issues not already discussed. Each section will be allocated approximately 20 minutes.

Your Mayor

The Mayor makes long-term plans for London’s transport, planning, culture, sport, environment and economic and spatial development. His plans set out priorities for organisations from boroughs to bus companies. The Mayor also sets budgets for the Metropolitan Police Authority and London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority, Transport for London and the London Development Agency.

Your London Assembly

The London Assembly examines and questions the Mayor on his decisions and strategies and holds him to account for his actions. It may also amend the Mayor’s budget if two-thirds of Assembly Members agree to do so. The Assembly also investigates important London issues – from the emergency response to the 7 July bombings to the state of London’s transport services.

Your questions

If you would like to put a question to the Mayor or London Assembly at PQT, you can fill out theonline form or else email your question topeoplesquestions@london.gov.uk. Some questions submitted in advance will be asked on the night. Any questions not answered on the night will be responded to afterwards.

London’s Film Festival

On the 15th October this year the brash, populist, deliciously unwieldy London Film Festival will roll into town, trumpeting its wares like a mountebank trying to peddle Agent Orange in the guise of Dr. Humpington’s Miracle Cure Spectacular. For make no mistake, London is the Danny Dyer of film festivals -all sound and fury, but signifying very little.

It doesn’t have the glitz and glamour of Cannes, the intellectual suffocation of Berlin or the zeitgeist-surfing nostalgia of Sundance. Though it was never meant to - from its genesis in 1956 the London Film Festival was designed to give public fora to a variety of hoity-toity Euro-smut that wouldn’t traditionally find a home in the fleapit cinematic basements of a derelict city that preferred whelks to Wilder and cockles to Cocteau.

But London long ago emerged spitting and kicking out of those dark ages - the Curzon chain, including the excellent Renoir, brings an outstanding variety of foreign films to Central London, while even monolithic chains like Odeon and Vue have their outlets for movies that sit just outside the mainstream. The Film Festival has, admittedly upped its game accordingly, with an extraordinary breadth of themes and events available to Joe Public during the two weeks of autumnal madness in 2007, from the tender bestiality documentary “Zoo” to Werner Herzog’s frankly baffling dip into flag-waving Americana, “Rescue Dawn”.

And it is pleasing that the Mayor is up to his neck in all this filmic tomfoolery. Ken Livingstone, god rest his soul, pumped £100k from the London Development Agency into ensuring that the Film Festival has the facilities befitting such a famous fandango, and also towards making it possible for cinemas outside of the traditional ground double zero of Leicester Square and the South Bank to show LFF films. The Mayor of London’s annual gala at the Festival is one of the few glimmers of glamour in an otherwise rather downbeat coupe of weeks, although exactly why it involved a screening of the resolutely non-London based “Lust, Caution” in 2007 is anyone’s guess.

But despite its purportedly accessible credentials, the London Film Festival still smacks of exclusivity to the vast masses who still balk at the idea of paying £12.50 to see a film and who can’t really afford to take the time off work to see the half-price matinee of “Bee Movie”, no matter how tempting Jerry Seinfeld’s animated shtick.

And here lies Boris Johnson’s big opportunity. London has demonstrated that is has myriad open spaces suitable for showing films to the masses. My first Saturday upon moving to London was spent in gleeful harmony with enough communists to fill a long march watching “Battleship Potemkin” in Trafalgar Square, accompanied by some truly painful drivel by the Pet Shop Boys. Somerset House hosts the Summer Screen season in its romantic grounds, and our multitude of parks offer endless possibilities for a tent, a screen and maybe a bottle of 2005 Clos De Papes to keep the gloaming chills at bay.

The idea of offering free screenings of unusual filmic fayre may well be anathema to distributors and to the culturally disinterested, but to the thousands of film fans who embrace the idea of communal cinema this would be a wonderful way of opening up the Festival and returning it to the roots envisioned by James Quinn and his cabal of film critics in the post-war London gloom.

The London Film Festival should be the talk of the town and spread the excitement across the capital. Community groups should be encouraged to enhance screenings of foreign films with talks, exhibitions and stalls. The London boroughs should be identifying areas in their locality where communal cinema can be established and helping to provide the facilities and the advice that will be necessary to take this project forward. The Mayor should be taking the lead in demonstrating that he is a champion of British film, but also of bringing international cinema to one of the most diverse and welcoming cities in the world.

2008 will be the London Film Festival’s 52nd year. While the organisers will undoubtedly do a laudable job of concocting an eclectic, joyous celebration of world cinema, it is time to simultaneously blaze the trail and go back to the very heart of what the London Film Festival is all about - bringing the magic of cinema to the people of London. All of London.

Coming soon…

Tomorrow we post the first article by a new LondonSays blogger, Greg Taylor.

Greg’s bread and butter is local government, but his passion is the cinema. His blog tomorrow takes the Mayor to task for under-promoting the British film industry, and failing to take full advantage of the London film festival, which his office sponsors.

The culture of London, thankfully no longer Cool Britannia, is a large part of what makes the city so great. We have a vibrant theatre, film, art and social scene - Greg’s article will be the first of a series on LondonSays which examine them, and their impact, further.

If you can think of any areas which you feel the LS blog should be examining but isn’t, please drop us a line. Contributions are always welcome!

Mind the (Funding) Gap

We’ve been following the story of the Tube upgrade shortfall on LondonUnlocked for the past couple of days - below is an edited version of the article which appeared on that site earlier today:

200809111059.jpg

Following the news of the funding gap now faced by TfL, the Department for Transport (DfT) has given short thrift to suggestions that it should make up the shortfall:

“We have already agreed a generous long-term settlement with TfL, providing more than £40bn for London transport over the next 10 years.

“This took into account the possibility that the costs for delivering tube improvements could be higher than originally envisaged, as well as providing funding for Crossrail. It is now for TfL to manage this to deliver the high quality transport its users expect.”

At the time of the original settlement negotiation (by Ken Livingstone’s administration), concerns were expressed over a possible funding gap. Those concerns have now become a reality.

Where this leaves TfL, its passengers and London rate-payers still remains unclear. The DfT’s statement can only be the opening salvo of the public negotiation which will now take place. Already, in The Guardian, TfL has shot back by painting a picture of a London which doesn’t meet the funding gap:

Either the bill must be met, or less work will be done. The result, according to tube boss Tim O’Toole, would be that “the tube will become less reliable and capacity will shrink” - which means stations being shut down to prevent overcrowding and fewer trains to carry record numbers of passengers.

Quite obviously this is not the vision which the Government would want to promote of Britain as the first tourists start arriving for the Olympics in 2012. Someone has to step up.

As we stated yesterday, cost-cutting is the order of the day. In City Hall the Mayor is throwing everything which is not buckled down overboard, whilst long gestating projects are being shrunk and diverted in scope. These measures, whilst admirable in their aims, are short sighted, and will not make a dent in the “up to £3bn” funding hole faced by TfL.

Make no mistake, the plug for this hole will be found - the real question is how much of a hit Londoners will take in supplying their part of it. That is the negotiation which is playing out now.

UPDATE: Londonist has a great editorial on the same subject here.

Crime Maps

200809031225.jpg

Boris Johnson’s election pledge of making crime maps of London available to the public has been met. You can now access the maps here and drill down for information on your area once on the site.

Deputy Commissioner Paul Stephenson said about the scheme:

We have found that in some cases Londoners’ perception of crime is higher than the reality and the crime maps may help to reassure communities about the general safety of their local area.

LondonSays has argued in their favour in the past - what Mr Johnson and Sir Ian Blair do with them is now the issue. Electorally, this is going to be a mixed bag for anyone facing re-election, providing a wealth of “under x’s tenure this has gone up” statistics for their opponents.

A bold move by the Mayor and the Met.

A Doomed Campaign?

200808280922.jpg

Posting is light over the summer as we work on other projects, but this story dragged me back to the laptop:

Former London mayor Ken Livingstone is to work as a consultant for Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez… The BBC’s James Ingham said the two men, who share left-wing political views, hugged each other like old friends.

Given the interest placed on Boris Johnson’s other jobs in the run up to the last election, for his rival (who wasn’t discrete in pushing the idea that Mr Johnson would be too distracted to do the role justice) to take such a high-profile and controversial contract seems like electoral suicide. Doing so in public shows the (slightly arrogant) surety of purpose which, I believe, put many Londoners off when they reached the ballot box last May.

Whilst the ex-Mayor continues to float his ‘not ruling out’ running again, I fail to see how this move can do anything but harm any attempt to return to power. Your thoughts?

A Lack of Narrative

200808221136.jpg

Boris Johnson’s teams should be worried about the recent editorials on his mayoralty found in the FT and Economist. Both come to the same conclusion - that his administration is lacking direction. From the Economist’s article:

Even Mr Livingstone’s critics concede that he had a vision for London: he championed growth, introduced the congestion charge and modernised public transport. It is less evident that Mr Johnson has a similarly clear sense of direction.

If this impression is allowed to become received wisdom then Mr Johnson will face the same trouble as the Prime Minister - seen as able but directionless, keeping the boat afloat rather than taking it anywhere. That is not a compelling narrative for re-election.

Mr Johnson has taken the admirable step of personally taking charge of the MPA and TfL - tasks which even his most fervent backers believed he would delegate to his army of deputies. He now needs to focus on proving that he has a vision for London which extends beyond running the Olympics on the cheap.

Governing London

200808211136.jpgThom Dyke has written an excellent article in The Times detailing the problems faced in governing London:

Attempts to regulate London are almost as old as the city. The post of mayor was created in the 12th century in exchange for Richard I levying taxes on London’s merchants to pay for the Crusades. Since then, the many attempts to reorganise London government have been so chaotic that Tony Travers, of the London School of Economics, has wondered whether it is “an ungovernable city”.

Well worth a read.

Breaking: Tim Parker

200808190927.jpg

The following press release has just been issued by City Hall:

The Mayor of London has decided to continue chairing the board of Transport for London.

Boris Johnson was due to hand over the role to Tim Parker this September, but has concluded that his personal involvement is crucial to being an effective Mayor, and to ensure appropriate democratic accountability to the people of London.

Mr Parker will remain on the board and advise the Mayor on the reform and improvement of London transport.

The Mayor said: “Transport for London is responsible for a huge range of transport policies that impinge directly on the lives of Londoners and I was delighted when Tim Parker agreed to take charge of the Board on my behalf. Over the last few weeks, however, it has become increasingly apparent to both of us that the nature of the decisions that need to be take are highly political and there is no substitute for me, as the directly elected Mayor, being in charge. There are limits, therefore, to what can be delegated.”

Tim Parker said: “I look forward to advising Boris on an ongoing basis on transport. I have concluded, however, that it would not be appropriate for an unelected official to chair a body which is responsible for most of the money and a large part of the brief of an elected Mayor. I also agree with the Mayor that my position as adviser does not justify my full time and exclusive commitment to the Greater London Authority, or the title of First Deputy Mayor. We have therefore decided to adjust the management structure and abolish that position.”

The Mayor emphasised: “London has not lost the services of Tim Parker. He has completed the first stages of the GLA’s restructuring and we will continue to benefit from his advice. I’m also personally gratefully to him for his continuing support and friendship.”

ENDS

At this stage, it’s not clear what has driven this move. Mr Parker’s involvement in the administration was announced with great guns, and the curtailing of his role puts Boris firmly in the driving seat of the Administration.

City Hall sources tell me that Sir Simon Milton is to take up much of Mr Parker’s work on GLA restructuring - a report on which is due this month.

Having parted ways with Nic Boles and James McGrath - and now limiting the powers of Tim Parker - it is up to Boris and his Policy Exchange team to lead the policy drive and restructuring of London Government.

Certainly, with Boris permanently sitting atop TfL and the MPA, he is taking a far more active role in governing than was envisaged by many.

UPDATE: Iain Dale offers his views here.